Significant Changes to the Human Rights Tribunal’s Rules – Kelly McDermott and Jeremy Schwartz
Related Posts
The Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario has heard many cases brought by injured workers against the Workplace Safety and Insurance…
Since the Supreme Court decision in British Columbia (Workers’ Compensation Board) v. Figliola (“Figliola”), the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario (the…
In April, we blogged that the Supreme Court of Canada had granted leave to appeal a decision regarding the random alcohol testing…
Controlling Costs in Defending Human Rights Complaints – Joe Morrison
As readers of our Blog and recent update are aware, the blockbuster Supreme Court decision in British Columbia (Workers’ Compensation Board) v. Figliola,…
Supreme Court Allows Employees to “Double-Up” on Pregnancy and Parental Benefits A regular point of contention between unions and employers…
By: Jeremy Schwartz and Amanda Boyce In-house counsel is often the unsung hero of a legal saga, having guided their…
Employers are still wrestling with the consequences of the Supreme Court’s landmark decision on the random drug and alcohol testing…
When is an owner also an “employee”? The Supreme Court of Canada recently rendered a decision on the question of…
Allison Taylor discusses the recent Federal Court of Appeal decision which outlined a new, balanced test for family status discrimination…
The Ontario Labour Relations Board (“OLRB”) recently made an important decision which may represent a significant shift in how it…
By: Landon Young and Jessica Young Employee addiction is a challenging topic for HR professionals. Under Canadian human rights legislation, drug…
Alberta Human Rights Tribunal Awards Employee $650,000 – Kelly McDermott
As we have noted in previous updates, the size of general damages awarded by human rights tribunals has trended sharply…
Employers are often unsure whether they have the right to ask for doctor’s notes (i.e. medical evidence) to justify employee…