The Ontario Superior Court has ruled that an employee who continued to work for 15 months following a change in his terms and conditions of employment had not condoned the change and could claim damages for constructive dismissal. Read more about this surprising decision and key lessons for employers to learn in our Latest Update.
Jeremy D. Schwartz / About Author
Related Posts
Off-Duty Drunk Driving Not Just Cause for Termination – Even for a Firefighter
In Klonteig v West Kelowna (District), the British Columbia Superior Court found that an employer that terminated a firefighter for driving…
27 Jun 2018
Terra Firma No More: Supreme Court Changes the Ground Rules on Contracts
By: Jeremy D. Schwartz and Frank B. Portman The recent Supreme Court decision in Sattva Capital Corp v Creston Moly Corp …
29 Sep 2014
Director sentenced to jail time for failure to pay wages under the ESA
In a recent decision, the Ontario Court of Justice sentenced the director of six Ontario companies, Steven Blondin, to 90…
19 Nov 2012
Plaintiffs May Think Twice Before Filing Suit Under New Rules
On January 1, 2010 the rules governing civil actions in Ontario are to undergo sweeping changes. One notable change is…
09 Dec 2009
Dial “D” for Dismissal: Employee Fired after “Pocket-Dial”
Most people have received (or sent) a “pocket-dial”, which is an unintentional cell phone call that is made by a…
15 Oct 2015
Using independent contractor not a “get out of jail free” card
A business’ obligations to its workers will depend on whether the workers are employees or independent contractors. However, a recent…
12 Apr 2017
2013 Q4 StringerLLP HR Law Webinar, Segment 4: Punitive Damages
Jeremy Schwartz discusses recent punitive damages awards in Ontario
21 Jan 2014
Court Precludes Terminated Employee from Relying on Employer’s Apology
In April of 2009, a little known law called the Apology Act (the “Act”) entered into force. A very short act, it primarily…
17 Sep 2015
When is an Owner an Employee?
When is an owner also an “employee”? The Supreme Court of Canada recently rendered a decision on the question of…
24 Jun 2014
Supreme Court to Review Definition of “Unjust” Dismissals for Federal Employers
In February, we wrote about a decision by the Federal Court of Appeal in Wilson v Atomic Energy Limited (see our earlier…
23 Jul 2015
It’s Party Time: Planning a Safe and Liability Free Office Holiday Party
As we roll into December, many employers will be hosting an office holiday party for their employees. While these events…
29 Nov 2011
Does a COVID Leave Trigger Constructive Dismissal? Even Courts are Coming to Opposite Conclusions
By Jeremy Schwartz and Haadi Malik In April, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice ruled in Coutinho v Ocular Health Centre…
10 Jun 2021
Early Bird Registration Now Open: 16th Annual Employment Law Conference
Stringer LLP and First Reference are proud to host the 16th Annual Ontario Employment Law Conference in Mississauga. We invite business owners and…
03 Mar 2015
Don’t Forget to Consider “Consideration” – Jeremy Schwartz
Don’t Forget to Consider “Consideration” – Jeremy Schwartz
23 Nov 2010
The Supreme Court to Lay Down the Law on Random Alcohol Testing
The law in Canada regarding random drug and alcohol testing has been inconsistent for some time, with the Alberta and…
03 Apr 2012