It is a good practice for employers to have employees sign a full and final release when their employment is terminated in order to avoid future law suits arising from the employment relationship. Recent cases of the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario illustrate a trend in the jurisprudence toward dismissing human rights applications by employees who have signed a release. Read about these decisions and tips to make your release enforceable in our latest update
Jeremy D. Schwartz / About Author
Related Posts
Solid evidentiary burden to prove constructive dismissal due to poisoned work environment
In a recent decision, General Motors of Canada Limited v. Johnson, the Ontario Court of Appeal provided clarity on an employee’s…
14 Aug 2013
Human Rights Tribunal Discourages Unnecessary Naming of Personal Respondents in Applications
In Sterling v Wendy’s Restaurant, the applicants (a former Wendy’s employee and his wife), named 14 personal respondents, who were members…
07 Sep 2011
Stress Claim Tsunami: New Approach to WSIB Stress Claims
Ryan Conlin and Jeremy Schwartz discuss a landmark WSIAT decision which held sections of the Workplace Safety and Insurance Act…
29 May 2014
Federal Court of Appeal Revises Test for Family Status Discrimination
In another twist in the rapidly developing area of family status discrimination law, the Federal Court of Appeal recently released…
20 May 2014
2015 Q1 StringerLLP HR Law Webinar, Segment 4: Family Status Caselaw Update
Allison Taylor explains the unfavourable result of a recent judicial review decision in Alberta concerning family status discrimination.
21 Apr 2015
OLRB opens the door to harassment reprisal complaints under the OHSA
The Ontario Labour Relations Board (“OLRB”) recently made an important decision which may represent a significant shift in how it…
08 Jan 2014
COVID-19: Lessons from the HR Trenches
Perhaps now more than ever before, the lawyers at Stringer LLP have been deeply engaged, supporting clients who face significant,…
30 Jul 2020
Blame the Lawyer? Drawing Best Practices for In-House Counsel from the Jurisprudence
By: Jeremy Schwartz and Amanda Boyce In-house counsel is often the unsung hero of a legal saga, having guided their…
14 Sep 2016
Vaccine Mandates: The Courts and Arbitrators are Weighing In
Date: Dec 06, 2021 Vaccine mandates have been legally and politically controversial in Canada and around the world. We are…
06 Dec 2021
Has BC Court opened the door to more court claims of harassment?
Since the early 1980s, plaintiffs have been precluded from bringing court actions solely predicated on suffering discrimination or harassment under…
09 Apr 2019
2013 Q3 StringerLLP HR Law Webinar, Segment 1: AODA Update
This is segment 1 of 5 from our Q3 webinar held on Thursday, October 10, “Upcoming AODA Obligations – What You Need…
12 Oct 2013
Alphabet Soup – Navigating the Waters of SUBs, CERBS, Layoffs, Work-Sharing and Subsidies in the Corona Virus Emergency
Canadian employers have been confronted with a veritable ocean of new government programs, which are designed to help weather the…
16 Apr 2020
What does “Disability” Actually Mean for Accommodation Purposes?
The law is clear that an employer is required to accommodate employees with a “disability” up to the point of…
22 May 2013
2013 Q4 StringerLLP HR Law Webinar, Segment 3: WSIB & Forum Shopping
Allison Taylor discusses recent decisions from the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario suggesting a disturbing trend in that tribunal permitting…
21 Jan 2014
Accommodating scent sensitivities in the workplace
Employers must accommodate employees with disabilities to the point of undue hardship under the Ontario Human Rights Code. The accommodation of…
15 Oct 2012