Employers who only provide the minimum amounts required by employment standards legislation after termination are gambling. Sometimes this approach can result in cost savings, but it can also end in a costly damages and legal costs award as occurred in the case of Brito v. Canac Kitchens. Read our Latest Update for more information about the case, and what to do to protect your organization from such awards.
Jeremy D. Schwartz / About Author
Related Posts
Court Certifies Overtime Class Action
The Ontario Superior Court of Justice has ruled that representative plaintiff Cindy Fulakwa can proceed with her class action against…
10 Mar 2010
Rising Tide of Human Rights Damages
Ryan Conlin and Frank Portman discuss the disturbing trend of increasingly large general damages awards in human rights litigation.
25 Jun 2014
Taking a Hard Line on Termination Entitlements Ends Up Costing More
In a recent Court of Appeal Decision, Elsegood v Cambridge Spring Services, the Court awarded common law damages to an employee…
09 Jan 2012
A wrongful dismissal time warp – When is two years really six?
Perhaps, when an ex-employee takes six years to “discover” that they were wrongfully dismissed. Thankfully, the Ontario Court of Appeal…
24 Dec 2019
Responding to Human Rights Harassment Complaints: Guidelines from the HRTO – Jeremy Schwartz
Responding to Human Rights Harassment Complaints: Guidelines from the HRTO – Jeremy Schwartz
10 Jul 2009
“Rocket Docket” to Summary Judgment in “Without Cause” Wrongful Dismissal Cases
An Ontario Court has signaled that it is prepared to adjudicate wrongful dismissal cases very quickly where the employer has not asserted…
26 Jul 2013
What Employers Need to Know about Opinions from Non-Doctor Health and Medical Professionals
The recent admission of a large number of new health professions to those recognized in the Ontario Regulated Health Professions Act,…
31 Aug 2015
Court of Appeal upholds decision granting employee notice period based on employment with predecessors
We have previously written on the decision of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice in Danbury v 1416088 Ontario Ltd (see our…
15 May 2015
The Supreme Court to Lay Down the Law on Random Alcohol Testing
The law in Canada regarding random drug and alcohol testing has been inconsistent for some time, with the Alberta and…
03 Apr 2012
Ontario Government Announces Details of the Ontario Retirement Pension Plan
By: Jeremy Schwartz and Jessica Young Recently, the Ontario Government provided new details regarding the Ontario Retirement Pension Plan (the “ORPP”). The…
31 Aug 2015
2013 Q3 StringerLLP HR Law Webinar, Segment 3: Settlement Confidentiality
This is segment 3 of 5 from our Q3 webinar held on Thursday, October 10, “Breach of Confidentiality Clauses in Settlements”
12 Oct 2013
Federally Regulated Employees do not have Just Cause Protection
A recent decision of Canada’s Federal Court of Appeal has provided clarity to a decades-long debate as to whether non-unionized, federally regulated…
18 Feb 2015
When a resignation isn’t really a resignation
How do you know when an employee has quit her job? It may seem like a simple question, but the…
24 Jan 2017
2016 Q2 HR-Law Webinar Part 1: Fixed Term Trap
Landon Young discusses how to avoid the fixed term contract trap.
19 Jul 2016
Mud in the Water: Divisional Court holds limiting language required to displace presumption of reasonable notice
It is becoming increasingly difficult for employers to understand what language is required in order for a termination clause to…
18 Dec 2018