Employers who only provide the minimum amounts required by employment standards legislation after termination are gambling. Sometimes this approach can result in cost savings, but it can also end in a costly damages and legal costs award as occurred in the case of Brito v. Canac Kitchens. Read our Latest Update for more information about the case, and what to do to protect your organization from such awards.
Jeremy D. Schwartz / About Author
Related Posts
Federal Court of Appeal Rules on When Federal Employers Must Appoint a Workplace Violence Investigator
The Canadian law on workplace violence and harassment continues to develop, particularly in relation to the duty to investigate. Employers…
22 Mar 2016
Long and Winding Road Managing Emerging Employment and OHS Issues in the COVID Transition
Employers have made their plans; they’ve hunkered down; and they’ve sheltered in place. As we traverse the long and winding…
11 Dec 2020
Blame the Boss An Update on Training Obligations for Employers and Supervisors
Date: September 8, 2023 A New Brunswick court has rejected a supervisor’s attempt to blame his criminal non-compliance with OHS…
11 Sep 2023
Mitigation – A duty to act in your own professional interest
When no work is available in a particular field, dismissed employees may undertake reasonable mitigation efforts by pursuing re-training to…
30 Dec 2016
How NOT to Draft an Enforceable Non-Competition Agreement
To be enforceable, non-competition agreements must, as a general rule, be reasonable and unambiguous in terms of their geographic scope,…
20 Mar 2013
2014 Q3 StringerLLP HR Law Webinar, Segment 4: AODA Enforcement Update
Jessica Young discusses recent enforcement activities under the new Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act (AODA)
14 Oct 2014
Recent Amendments to Rule 76 Simplified Procedure
Recent amendments to Rule 76 of the Ontario Rules of Civil Procedure will help to reduce legal costs and streamline the litigation…
29 Jan 2020
Court Rules no Class Action for Constructive Dismissal
The Ontario Superior Court of Justice has refused to permit a group of former Allstate Insurance employees to sue Allstate…
29 Apr 2011
Does a COVID Leave Trigger Constructive Dismissal? Even Courts are Coming to Opposite Conclusions
By Jeremy Schwartz and Haadi Malik In April, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice ruled in Coutinho v Ocular Health Centre…
10 Jun 2021
2014 Q4 StringerLLP HR Law Webinar, Segment 1: Just Cause Update
Landon Young provides draws on recent, wrongful dismissal caselaw to provide guidance to employers considering whether to terminate an employee…
21 Jan 2015
Supreme Court to Review Definition of “Unjust” Dismissals for Federal Employers
In February, we wrote about a decision by the Federal Court of Appeal in Wilson v Atomic Energy Limited (see our earlier…
23 Jul 2015
Pay in Lieu of Notice by Salary Continuance Deemed Implicit Right
The Ontario Superior Court of Justice recently ruled in Bowes v. Goss Power Products Ltd., that a fairly standard termination provision…
29 Sep 2011
2013 Q3 StringerLLP HR Law Webinar, Segment 5: Post Retirement Benefits
This is segment 5 of 5 from our Q3 webinar held on Thursday, October 10, “Risks Associated with Reducing Post-Retirement Benefits”
12 Oct 2013
Court Precludes Terminated Employee from Relying on Employer’s Apology
In April of 2009, a little known law called the Apology Act (the “Act”) entered into force. A very short act, it primarily…
17 Sep 2015
Using independent contractor not a “get out of jail free” card
A business’ obligations to its workers will depend on whether the workers are employees or independent contractors. However, a recent…
12 Apr 2017