Employers who only provide the minimum amounts required by employment standards legislation after termination are gambling. Sometimes this approach can result in cost savings, but it can also end in a costly damages and legal costs award as occurred in the case of Brito v. Canac Kitchens. Read our Latest Update for more information about the case, and what to do to protect your organization from such awards.
Jeremy D. Schwartz / About Author
Related Posts
Reduce, Reconsider, Restore: Court of Appeal Strikes Down Reduction of Notice Period Due to Economic Circumstances of Employer
Notwithstanding the best wishes of employers, there are times when employees have to be let go for purely financial reasons. …
15 Dec 2015
It’s Party Time: Planning a Safe and Liability Free Office Holiday Party
As we roll into December, many employers will be hosting an office holiday party for their employees. While these events…
29 Nov 2011
ONCA Finds “Golden Parachute” Provision not Implicitly Subject to the Duty to Mitigate
In a decision by a rare, five-judge panel, the Ontario Court of Appeal (ONCA) ruled that a specific notice provision…
25 Jun 2012
Continuing to Work Following Changes to Employment Not Considered Acceptance of Changes – Joe Morrison
Continuing to Work Following Changes to Employment Not Considered Acceptance of Changes – Joe Morrison
12 Apr 2011
Supreme Court of Canada Rules in Favour of Postal Workers in Pay Equity Human Rights Decision
The claim was filed 28 years ago by female employees of Canada Post with the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal (the…
21 Nov 2011
Alberta court rules on the limits of good faith in the performance of employment contracts
In a recent decision, the Alberta Court of Appeal strongly affirmed employers’ right to terminate employees without cause, and without…
31 Jan 2017
Registration now Open for our 26th Annual Employers’ Conference
Don’t Miss our 26th Annual Employers’ Conference, Labour & Employment Law Update 2012. Register Early! Topics Include: A Terminated Employee’s…
05 Sep 2012
Revoking Telecommute Agreement A Constructive Dismissal
The Ontario Superior Court recently found that an employee had been constructively dismissed when her employer reneged on its promise…
20 Feb 2018
The Enemy Within: Protecting Your Business and Confidential Information from Departing Employees
Don’t miss our May 16 Webinar:
11 Apr 2011
Embracing the #MeToo Movement
#MeToo has quickly caught wind as a widespread movement that sheds light on the prevalence of sexual assault and harassment,…
18 Sep 2019
Termination Clauses: Clearly Restrictive Language Necessary for Enforceability
The Alberta Court of Appeal recently upheld a trial decision that struck a termination clause down as unenforceable. The Facts…
15 Feb 2018
Change is Coming: Bill 148: Fair Workplaces, Better Jobs Act Passes Third Reading
Bill 148, the Fair Workplaces, Better Jobs Act, passed its third and final reading today. With Liberal and NDP MPPs…
22 Nov 2017
Changes to Privacy Legislation: Impact on Employers’ Handling of Employee Information
The federal government has re-introduced legislation to amend the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (PIPEDA). Bill C-12, Safeguarding Canadians’ Personal…
15 Nov 2011
2016 Q2 HR-Law Webinar Part 5: ONCA on General Damages
Frank Portman discusses a recent Ontario Court of Appeal decision which greatly increased the scope of general and other damages…
19 Jul 2016
Constructively Dismissed Employee Entitled to Bonus Despite Plan Language?
By: Landon Young There have been a number of cases in recent years considering whether dismissed employees are entitled to awards…
03 Nov 2020