Employers who only provide the minimum amounts required by employment standards legislation after termination are gambling. Sometimes this approach can result in cost savings, but it can also end in a costly damages and legal costs award as occurred in the case of Brito v. Canac Kitchens. Read our Latest Update for more information about the case, and what to do to protect your organization from such awards.
Jeremy D. Schwartz / About Author
Related Posts
Federally Regulated Employees do not have Just Cause Protection
A recent decision of Canada’s Federal Court of Appeal has provided clarity to a decades-long debate as to whether non-unionized, federally regulated…
18 Feb 2015
Tribunal Awards Four Years’ Lost Wages to Job Applicant Who Lied About Immigration Status
The Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario (the “Tribunal”) recently awarded $101,363.16, representing four years’ lost salary, and $15,000.00 for injury to dignity,…
24 Sep 2019
Immigration Issues in M&A Transactions
Navigating the intricate legal environment of a merger, acquisition, takeover or other corporate restructuring can be difficult enough without the…
01 Nov 2019
Court Precludes Terminated Employee from Relying on Employer’s Apology
In April of 2009, a little known law called the Apology Act (the “Act”) entered into force. A very short act, it primarily…
17 Sep 2015
Once a Construction Employee, Not Always a Construction Employee? Ontario Court Finds Yet Another Way to Invalidate a Termination Clause
By: Amanda D. Boyce and Erika M. Montisano A recent and troubling decision from the Ontario Superior Court of Justice…
20 Jul 2020
Early Bird Registration Now Open: 16th Annual Employment Law Conference
Stringer LLP and First Reference are proud to host the 16th Annual Ontario Employment Law Conference in Mississauga. We invite business owners and…
03 Mar 2015
Continuing to Work Following Changes to Employment Not Considered Acceptance of Changes – Joe Morrison
Continuing to Work Following Changes to Employment Not Considered Acceptance of Changes – Joe Morrison
12 Apr 2011
Ontario Superior Court takes “Trust” Approach to Mitigation at Summary Judgment
Summary judgment has increasingly become a process used to litigate wrongful dismissal actions. It can be attractive as it allows…
06 Aug 2015
2013 Q3 StringerLLP HR Law Webinar, Segment 1: AODA Update
This is segment 1 of 5 from our Q3 webinar held on Thursday, October 10, “Upcoming AODA Obligations – What You Need…
12 Oct 2013
Mitigating by returning to work: it depends on the circumstances
When must a dismissed employee accept an offer of alternate employment with their employer? In some circumstances, employees will be…
02 Jun 2017
Does Human Rights Legislation Apply to Job Ads on Facebook?
Technological advancements frequently outpace the law’s ability to respond to the challenges they create. With the click of a button,…
12 Apr 2019
Court Limits Bonus Entitlement During Notice Period
An often-contentious issue in wrongful dismissal litigation is whether an employee is entitled to a bonus that accrues or would…
22 Sep 2017
Blame the Lawyer? Drawing Best Practices for In-House Counsel from the Jurisprudence
By: Jeremy Schwartz and Amanda Boyce In-house counsel is often the unsung hero of a legal saga, having guided their…
14 Sep 2016
Alphabet Soup – Navigating the Waters of SUBs, CERBS, Layoffs, Work-Sharing and Subsidies in the Corona Virus Emergency
Canadian employers have been confronted with a veritable ocean of new government programs, which are designed to help weather the…
16 Apr 2020
Mitigation – A duty to act in your own professional interest
When no work is available in a particular field, dismissed employees may undertake reasonable mitigation efforts by pursuing re-training to…
30 Dec 2016