In a recent decision of the Supreme Court of Canada, the Court dealt with the issue of awarding legal costs in a human rights complaint. This decision provides a good reminder to employers and employees of the significance of legal costs in such proceedings. Read about this decision and the practical implications in our Latest Update.
Related Posts
Hypothetical Standards: Human Rights Tribunal finds Police Liable for Racism – Jeremy Schwartz
Most employers are likely familiar with the WSIB return to work process which often involves a WSIB employee attending at…
Perhaps now more than ever before, the lawyers at Stringer LLP have been deeply engaged, supporting clients who face significant,…
The Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario has heard many cases brought by injured workers against the Workplace Safety and Insurance…
In another twist in the rapidly developing area of family status discrimination law, the Federal Court of Appeal recently released…
Alberta Human Rights Tribunal Awards Employee $650,000 – Kelly McDermott
Date: November 27, 2023 As employers weather the storm of post-pandemic economic sluggishness, rising interest rates and an emboldened workforce,…
Workplace investigations have been an increasingly important topic for HR Professionals in the past few years. Employers have a duty…
Jeremy Schwartz and Jessica Young recently published an article on forum shopping by disabled employees in the Lawyers Weekly: Labour & Employment…
Most employers are likely familiar with the WSIB return to work process which often involves a WSIB employee attending at…
In a recent decision, General Motors of Canada Limited v. Johnson, the Ontario Court of Appeal provided clarity on an employee’s…
Among the amendments to Ontario’s human rights system in the past few years was the creation of a summary hearings…
The AODA Employment Standard deadlines are not as far away as they may seem. The Employment Standard is one of…
Jeremy Schwartz and Jessica Young recently published an article on forum shopping by disabled employees in the Lawyers Weekly: Labour & Employment…
In Sterling v Wendy’s Restaurant, the applicants (a former Wendy’s employee and his wife), named 14 personal respondents, who were members…

