Frank Portman discusses a recent, significant decision from the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario concerning remedies and mental illness in the workplace.
Related Posts
By: Jeremy Schwartz and Frank Portman We have written before on the decision of the Federal Court of Appeal in Johnstone…
When is an owner also an “employee”? The Supreme Court of Canada recently rendered a decision on the question of…
Date: Mar 04. 2022 The Omicron wave appears to be receding and there is cautious optimism that the worst of…
In another twist in the rapidly developing area of family status discrimination law, the Federal Court of Appeal recently released…
In a past Stringer Update, Releases Protect Employers from Human Rights Complaints, we emphasized the importance of having terminated employees sign…
Hypothetical Standards: Human Rights Tribunal finds Police Liable for Racism – Jeremy Schwartz
An injured worker has succeeded in a human rights application against the Workplace Safety Insurance Board (“WSIB”). The case related to a…
Controlling Costs in Defending Human Rights Complaints – Joe Morrison
Jessica Young explains the inherent risks associated with “encouraging” employees to retire.
In Sterling v Wendy’s Restaurant, the applicants (a former Wendy’s employee and his wife), named 14 personal respondents, who were members…
It is a good practice for employers to have employees sign a full and final release when their employment is…
This is segment 1 of 5 from our Q3 webinar held on Thursday, October 10, “Upcoming AODA Obligations – What You Need…
On September 4, 2020, Ryan and Jeremy discussed the legal tightrope in terms of employee attendance management, that employers must…
In 2011, the Supreme Court of Canada released its decision in British Columbia (Workers’ Compensation Board) v Figliola (“Figliola”). The Figliola decision addressed the…
In British Columbia (Workers’ Compensation Board) v. Figliola, a decision released in October 2011, the Supreme Court of Canada found that…