Frank Portman discusses a recent, significant decision from the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario concerning remedies and mental illness in the workplace.
Related Posts
Ryan Conlin discusses recent changes to the WSIB return to work
Employers have a duty to accommodate employees with disabilities to the point of undue hardship, including facilitating the return to…
Employers have a duty to accommodate employees with disabilities to the point of undue hardship, including facilitating the return to…
Perhaps now more than ever before, the lawyers at Stringer LLP have been deeply engaged, supporting clients who face significant,…
Jessica Young explains the inherent risks associated with “encouraging” employees to retire.
Employers are still wrestling with the consequences of the Supreme Court’s landmark decision on the random drug and alcohol testing…
In a decision that will surely draw attention across the country, the Alberta Human Rights Tribunal has awarded an employee 5 years…
In a decision that will surely draw attention across the country, the Alberta Human Rights Tribunal has awarded an employee 5 years…
It is a good practice for employers to have employees sign a full and final release when their employment is…
The claim was filed 28 years ago by female employees of Canada Post with the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal (the…
When is an owner also an “employee”? The Supreme Court of Canada recently rendered a decision on the question of…
It has been a year since the Supreme Court of Canada’s decision in British Columbia (Workers’ Compensation Board) v. Figliola (“Figliola”). In…
A recent Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario decision confirms that family status protection may require employers to accommodate employees’ sporadic…
#MeToo has quickly caught wind as a widespread movement that sheds light on the prevalence of sexual assault and harassment,…
A recent Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario decision confirms that family status protection may require employers to accommodate employees’ sporadic…