Employers will be disappointed to hear the results of a recent decision in which the Ontario Court of Appeal declared the restrictive covenant in an employment contract, unenforceable. Read about this decision and tips to ensure your contracts are enforceable in our Latest Update.
Related Posts
While employee theft is frequently grounds for termination, shades of grey do appear in the case law. In a recent…
Jessica Young explains the inherent risks associated with “encouraging” employees to retire.
Continuing to Work Following Changes to Employment Not Considered Acceptance of Changes – Joe Morrison
Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act: How the Integrated Accessibility Standards Will Affect You – Jessica Young
In a recent Court of Appeal Decision, Elsegood v Cambridge Spring Services, the Court awarded common law damages to an employee…
This is segment 1 of 5 from our Q3 webinar held on Thursday, October 10, “Upcoming AODA Obligations – What You Need…
Even as the world grapples with variants and what appears to be the fourth wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, employers…
The Ontario government introduced Bill 66, Restoring Ontario’s Competitiveness Act, 2018 on December 6, 2018. Bill 66 passed First Reading, and is…
Employers that decide to implement a profit sharing plan for employees should make sure that the terms of the plan…
Over a period of five months, Crown Metal Packaging Canada LP provided Mr. Di Tomaso with five notices of termination, containing four…
The Ontario Superior Court has ruled that an employee who continued to work for 15 months following a change in…
We have previously written on the decision of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice in Danbury v 1416088 Ontario Ltd (see our…
The Ministry of Citizenship and Immigration Canada has made several announcements over the past couple weeks regarding proposed changes to…
By: Jeremy Schwartz Some organizations subscribe to the close your eyes and think good thoughts school of drafting, when it comes to…
The Ontario Superior Court recently awarded an employee on leave due to disability, damages representing the salary he would have…