The Boyce decision establishes that at least in some instances injured workers are free to attempt to concurrently pursue Human Rights Code remedies against their employer even if the WSIB has ruled in the employer’s favour with respect to whether work is suitable
Jeremy D. Schwartz / About Author
Related Posts
Accommodating scent sensitivities in the workplace
Employers must accommodate employees with disabilities to the point of undue hardship under the Ontario Human Rights Code. The accommodation of…
15 Oct 2012
Last Call for COVID? The Latest on the Road Back
Date: Mar 04. 2022 The Omicron wave appears to be receding and there is cautious optimism that the worst of…
04 Mar 2022
Is the Sky Falling? Family Status Discrimination and Shift Shopping
By: Ryan Conlin & Frank Portman In most jurisdictions in Canada, human rights legislation prohibits discrimination on the basis of…
07 Mar 2014
Random Drug Testing Debate – National Perspective?
In April, we blogged that the Supreme Court of Canada had granted leave to appeal a decision regarding the random alcohol testing…
16 Oct 2012
Holiday Webinar 5: Religious Accommodation
Amanda Boyce discusses accommodation obligations for non-Christian observers.
21 Dec 2016
Two Kicks at the Can: Worker Allowed to Re-litigate WSIB Accommodation Dispute at the Human Rights Tribunal
Most employers are likely familiar with the WSIB return to work process which often involves a WSIB employee attending at…
12 Nov 2013
Hypothetical Standards: Human Rights Tribunal finds Police Liable for Racism – Jeremy Schwartz
Hypothetical Standards: Human Rights Tribunal finds Police Liable for Racism – Jeremy Schwartz
23 Dec 2009
The Human Rights Tribunal Says No to Forum Shopping
It has been a year since the Supreme Court of Canada’s decision in British Columbia (Workers’ Compensation Board) v. Figliola (“Figliola”). In…
08 Nov 2012
Deal or No Deal?
Contracts of all kinds often fall apart over relatively minor details, despite the parties’ agreement on the majority of issues. …
26 Jun 2014
Supreme Court Allows Employees to “Double-Up” on Pregnancy and Parental Benefits
Supreme Court Allows Employees to “Double-Up” on Pregnancy and Parental Benefits A regular point of contention between unions and employers…
08 Dec 2014
Back to Basics: HRTO Follows Figliola and Refuses to Allow Relitigation of WSIB Claim
In 2011, the Supreme Court of Canada released its decision in British Columbia (Workers’ Compensation Board) v Figliola (“Figliola”). The Figliola decision addressed the…
05 Dec 2014
WSIB Return to Work Decisions: Are they Binding on the Human Rights Tribunal? – Ryan Conlin
WSIB Return to Work Decisions: Are they Binding on the Human Rights Tribunal? – Ryan Conlin
14 Sep 2010
Human Rights Tribunal Heeding Clear Direction from Supreme Court
In British Columbia (Workers’ Compensation Board) v. Figliola, a decision released in October 2011, the Supreme Court of Canada found that…
25 Jan 2012
Vaccine Mandates: The Courts and Arbitrators are Weighing In
Date: Dec 06, 2021 Vaccine mandates have been legally and politically controversial in Canada and around the world. We are…
06 Dec 2021
A New Way to Deal with Frivolous Human Rights Complaints Quickly and Cost Effectively
Among the amendments to Ontario’s human rights system in the past few years was the creation of a summary hearings…
19 Oct 2011